Legal Opinion

Clark v. Lineville Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1936No. 7 Div. 365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill was for cancellation of a mortgage or for redemption, as the case may require.

The rules that obtain and applicable to such a case are expressed in the statute, section 8272, Code of 1923, and our decisions. Ex parte Ina K. Lacy, 168 So. 554; Continental Life Ins. Co. of St. Louis, Mo., v. Brandt, 228 Ala. 570, 154 So. 903; Dewberry et al. v. Bank of Standing Rock et al., 227 Ala. 484, 150 So. 463; Sims v. Hester et al., 228 Ala. 321, 153 So. 281; Staples et al. v. Barfet et al., 214 Ala. 680, 108 So. 742, 46 A.L.R. 1084; Trotter Bros. v. Downs, 200 Ala. 158, 75 So.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Richardson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Zadek v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delony v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Hughes v. GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API