Legal Opinion

Rieser v. Bruck Plastics Co. (In re Trinity Plastics, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 10, 1991No. Bankruptcy No. 3-90-01827; Adv. No. 3-90-0209Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUED DISCOVERY AND DENYING MOTION FOR PAYMENT OF DISCOVERY EXPENSES

WILLIAM A. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the motion of the plaintiff to permit discovery pursuant to Bankr.R. 7056(f) and the Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Permit Discovery and Defendant’s Motion for Payment of Expenses of Discovery. The motions of the parties were accompanied by memoranda of law.

The pretrial order was entered in this case on February 1, 1991, which detailed the framework for proceeding in this adversary proceeding.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Melton v. McCormickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  4. Pashman v. Chemtex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API