Culp v. Culp
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1ConcurrenceMcLAUGHLIN, J.
I concur in the order dismissing the writ, and in the conclusions voiced in the main opinion touching jurisdiction and the right of this court to inquire into such jurisdiction. But I am unwilling, by silence, to lend implied consent to the proposition that the judgment relied upon as conclusive of petitioner’s right to the custody of this child could, under any state of facts, be enforced in this state through the medium of a writ of habeas corpus. This is exactly what petitioner seeks to accomplish by this proceeding. He insists that this court has no alternative, but must execute said…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.