Legal Opinion

Mount v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 1990No. A8901-00193; CA A61196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant insurance company (defendant) and its agent, Pittman. Pittman was served personally and defendant’s registered agent, Chamness, was served. Neither of them appeared, and an order of default and a default judgment were duly taken against them. Both defendants moved to set the judgment aside pursuant to ORCP 71B(l)(a). The trial court allowed Pittman’s motion but denied defendant’s. Defendant appeals, 1 and we affirm.

Defendant argues that it failed to appear because of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect by Chamness whose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wagar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Reitz v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF EUGENECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Sunriver Resort Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Knox v. GenX Clothing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Walters v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API