Knox v. GenX Clothing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant GenX Clothing, Inc., appeals an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment. Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to set aside the judgment on the ground of excusable neglect. We affirm.
We review a trial court’s denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment for abuse of discretion. Wood v. James W. Fowler Co., 168 Or App 308, 311, 7 P3d 577 (2000). If the facts are in dispute, we accept the trial court’s findings if there is evidence in the record to support those findings. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, 279 Or 569, 575, 569 P2d 567…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Wagar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- King v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terlyuk v. KrasnogorovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Johnson v. Sunriver Resort Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Gilbert v. Stancorp Financial Group Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.