Legal Opinion

Bamon Corp. v. City of Dayton

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 25, 1990No. C-3-89-445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. #5), CONSIDERED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED FOR DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 5). Since matters outside of the pleadings have been proffered by the parties and considered by the Court, said Motion will be considered as a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bamon Corp. v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Wolfe v. Village of Brice, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
  3. Franklin Jefferson, Ltd. v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. Wolfe v. Village of Brice, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. Bamon Corporation v. City Of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API