Legal Opinion

The Kroger Company v. Harold Dornbos and Beverly Dornbos, Individually and D/B/A H. J. Dornbos and Bro., and Rooks Transfer Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1969No. 18806_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

These two interlocutory appeals 1 involve the application of the Tennessee long-arm statute, T.C.A. § 20-235. 2 Kro ger purchased smoked fish from Dorn-bos, a Michigan partnership, under a written purchase order. Dornbos executed a written guaranty that the goods ordered and shipped were not misbranded or adulterated within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The purchase order required Dornbos to deliver the fish to Kroger’s warehouse in Tennessee in a proper manner by a means of transportation selected by the seller. The fish were refrigerated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Kroger Company v. Adkins Transfer CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. Tate v. Renault, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  5. Fayette v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. John Welsh and Flo-Start, Inc. v. James W. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Michael Sullivan v. LG Chem Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Kipperman v. McConeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  4. John Michael Pickens v. Richard and Patricia HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Adams v. Carter County Memorial HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API