Legal Opinion

Sparkman v. Davenport

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

This litigation is dependent upon the construction to be given to a contract for the sale of certain land situated in Collingsworth county, providing for a forfeiture of $3,000 against the prospective purchaser in favor of the sellet, and involving by virtue of this record the question of the performance by vendor of certain conditions stipulated in the contract, which, if performed, on account of the alleged default of the purchaser, the forfeiture is claimed to have been earned. The appellee, Davenport, as independent executor of the estate of M. W. Davenport, deceased, contracted on August…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Koppelmann v. KoppelmannTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hollifield v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matheson v. C-B Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Davenport v. SparkmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Lane v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Smith v. AllbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Reader v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API