Legal Opinion

Moskovitz v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1944No. 33,897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Streissguth, Justice.

Since 193á, plaintiff has conducted an off sale liquor business in St. Paul, in connection with which he has applied for and obtained off sale liquor, off sale malt beverage, and confectionery licenses, from year to year. By this suit, he seeks to restrain the city and its officers and its agents from revoking the licenses issued to him for the year 19áá.

On April 6, 1944, plaintiff pleaded guilty in the United States district court of Minnesota to two counts of an information charging him with separate violations of Maximum Price Regulation No. 193 of the Office of Price…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Lerner v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Matter of LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Sabes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Miller v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Chang v. PLANNING COM'N OF COUNTY OF MAUIHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Moore v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API