Legal Opinion

(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02444Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:19-cv-02444 KJM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All defendants except Ryan 19 Zender, who has not appeared, move for dismissal. ECF No. 11; see also ECF No. 14. Plaintiff 20 has opposed the motion. ECF No. 12. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API