Legal Opinion

(PC) Maraglino v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00826Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOROTHY GRACE MARIE MARAGLINO, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00826-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 13 v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ) [ECF No. 1] ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on June 15, 2020. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API