Legal Opinion

Worthen v. Badgett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. John R. Eakin, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Ch. J.:

These cases were argued and submitted on the same briefs. They involve the same principal questions, and may be disposed of by one opinion.

In the first case the bill was filed in the Pulaski Chancery Court, by Noah H. Badgett and wife, land owners and tax-payers of Pulaski County, for the benefit of themselves, and such other tax-payers whose lands were in the condition of theirs, as might think proper to make themselves parties, and claim the benefit of the relief prayed for by the bill. Robert W. Worthen, Clerk of the County Court of Pulaski County, was made defendant, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Case v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Board of Supervisors v. HeenanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  3. Hubbard v. BrainardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  4. Roseberry v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Crist v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Amos v. MosleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Turner v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Waterman v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Ex parte WrenMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. McElroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API