Legal Opinion

Livornese v. Medical Protective Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 2003No. Civil Action 01-3124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SCHILLER, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs in this action, Dr. Lawrence I. Livornese, Dr. David M. Rogers, and Chestnut Hill Cardiology Consultants, Ltd. (collectively “the Doctors”), were defendants in a medical malpractice suit tried in the Court of Common Pleas for Philadelphia County that resulted in a substantial judgment against them. Following the conclusion of the litigation in state court, Plaintiffs commenced this diversity action seeking the payment of prejudgment and post-judgment interest from their insurance carrier, The Medical Protective Company (“MedPro”),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Bateman v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Sanko v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API