Legal Opinion

Egner v. Hudson and Manhattan R.R. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hetfield, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained while a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains, as it arrived at the Exchange Place station, Jersey City. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals on the solo ground that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in its favor, contending that there was no evidence of any negligence on the part of the defendant or its agents, and that the undisputed testimony indicates that the accident was caused by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thurber v. Skouras Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Nazarro v. Hudson Manhattan Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  3. Miller v. Public Service Coordinated TransportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Nashville C. & St. L. Ry. v. KatzmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sek v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API