Legal Opinion

Birdwell v. Moore

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1982No. 4-1081A164PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

After trial in Madison Circuit Court, Special Judge Alva Cox presiding, Marie Duncan Birdwell and John Duncan, appellants, were permanently enjoined from obstructing the flow of water coming from the farm of Charles W. and Grace L. Moore, appel-lees. A motion to correct errors was timely filed and overruled. Birdwell and Duncan appeal and present the following issues 1 for review:

1. Was the evidence sufficient to show a watercourse existed?

2. Did the evidence show the volume of flowage had been increased by artificial means?

3. Was the evidence insufficient to show the natural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FickasIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Argyelan v. HavilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc. v. Marion Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Capes v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Town of Avon v. West Central Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Gasway v. LalenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Trowbridge v. TorabiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. KovichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API