Legal Opinion

Portnoy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1942No. L. A. 18151Published

1Opinion of the Court

20 Cal.2d 375 (1942)

FRANK PORTNOY et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 18151.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 1, 1942.

Clifford Thoms for Petitioners.

Earl Redwine, County Counsel, for Respondents.

GIBSON, C.J.

Petitioners seek this writ of certiorari to review judgments of conviction entered against them in a proceeding in the Justice's Court of the Township of Riverside. The judgments of conviction were affirmed by the Superior Court of Riverside County and petitioners sought a writ of review in the District Court of Appeal,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API