Legal Opinion
Foley & Lardner, L.L.P. v. Aldar Investments, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided May 30, 2007No. Civil Action 03-760-JJB, 04-866-JJBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRADY, District Judge.
These consolidated suits arise out of a dispute over attorney’s fees between AL-DAR Investments, Inc. (“Aldar”) and Foley & Lardner (“Foley”), a law firm that provided legal representation to Aldar in an antitrust suit.
In action 03-760, Foley claims that defendants Darlene Ransome (“Ransome”) and the Ransome Law Firm, L.L.C. (“RLF”), along with Aldar, defrauded Foley and deprived Foley of a collateral mortgage that Aldar promised to give to Foley as security for payment of attorney’s fees. In action 04-866, Foley claims that Kenneth G. Daniels…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cajun Services Unlimited LLC v. Benton Energy Service CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- In re RansomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Lee & Perles, L.L.P. v. Resolute Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
- USA, ex. rel., William St. John LaCorte, M.D. v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023