Legal Opinion

STATE, DOTD v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 20, 1992No. 91-C-2401, 91-C-2404PublishedCited by 217 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

597 So.2d 439 (1992)

STATE Of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT

v.

Nell Carter Ramage WILLIAMSON, et al.

Nos. 91-C-2401, 91-C-2404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1992.

John Barkley Knight, Jr., Joe Hart Dixon, Jr., Arnold, Pettway, Dixon & Collier, for defendants-applicants.

Harvey Lee Hall, Charles E. Soileau, Bertrand & Soileau, for plaintiff-respondent.

MARCUS, Justice.[*]

The primary issue in this expropriation case is the reasonableness of the attorney fees.

In May of 1983, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD), pursuant to La.R.S. 48:441,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Moody v. ArabieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. State Through DOTD v. Estate of DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Huddleston v. Bossier Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Corbello v. Iowa ProductionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Josh Norris v. Garry CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API