Legal Opinion

Elkins v. Auto Recovery Bureau

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 1, 1983No. 05-81-013334-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant, Rodney R. Elkins, appeals from a judgment dismissing this suit in a county court at law for want of jurisdiction. Appellees, Hobart Douglas Jameson, Sr., d/b/a Auto Recovery Bureau, and The Citadel Apartments, contend that the trial court was without jurisdiction because the amount in controversy exceeds $5000.00. For the reasons that follow we affirm in part and reverse in part.

In his original petition Elkins sued only Jameson for wrongful conversion of Elkins’ automobile alleging damages in the amount of $2000.00. Thereafter, Elkins filed amended pleadings which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haginas v. Malbis Memorial FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Flynt v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Monk v. Dallas Brake & Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Chapman v. Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Nuby v. Allied Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Totman v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Olivares v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API