State v. MacDonald

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This traffic checklane search and seizure case is before us on an interlocutory appeal. James MacDonald was charged with possession of .marijuana with intent to sell or distribute (K.S.A. 65-4127b[3]) and possession of drug paraphernalia (K.S.A. 65-4152[a][2]). The trial court suppressed the evidence seized during the checklane operation. We have jurisdiction under K.S.A. 2O-30l8(c) (transfer ón our. motion from the Court of Appeals)...The trial court applied K.S.A. .1992 Supp. 22-2402, commonly referred to as the stop and- frisk statute.…