Legal Opinion

PARKHILL TRUCK COMPANY v. Row

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1963No. 39238, 39252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

On September 29, 1958, James W. Row, hereafter referred to as “employee”, was employed by Parkhill Truck Company, hereafter referred to as “respondent”. On the mentioned date, employee sustained fatal bodily injuries in the course of his employment.

Marie A. Row, hereafter referred to as “claimant”, and Opal N. Row, each claim to be the surviving spouse of employee and as such assert the right to death benefits provided for in 85 O.S.1961 § 22, sub-paragraph 7 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The separate claims that they filed before the State Industrial Court were premised…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Capitol Steel & Iron Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Brokeshoulder v. BrokeshoulderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Sam v. SamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Hill v. ShreveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. PARKHILL TRUCK COMPANY v. RowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Roberts v. Rockwell InternationalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API