State ex rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Independent Consolidated School District No. 46
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Proceedings in quo warranto instituted upon the relation of J. A. A. Burnquist, attorney general, on behalf of the state challenging the validity of the formation of Independent Consolidated School District No. 46, Jackson county.
Respondents, Consolidated School District No. 46, its superintendent, and board members, pray for an abatement of the proceedings on the ground that the decision of the district court of Jackson county, in quo warranto proceedings there, is res judicata as to the issues here presented. For their further defenses, they plead estoppel against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Muehring v. School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Nelson v. BullardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Maffett v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Erickson v. SammonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Green v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- In Re Order of Sammons, Co. Superintendent of SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Rolvaag v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Hancock v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.