Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Brotherhood of Teamsters
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1972No. 72-1498PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board’s Order before us was based upon its finding that respondent union had violated Sections 8(b)(3) and 8(b) (1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. It was the determination of the Board that the respondent union, a member of a multi-union-multi-employer unit, had unlawfully refused to bargain by refusing to be bound by the negotiations of its representatives, such action “coming after negotiations for a new contract had been all but completed.”1 It had, *510moreover, it was found, by strikes, picketing, and threats thereof, sought to compel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jeffries Banknote CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. George M. Hart, Dba San Diego CabinetsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Shower Door Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Beck Engraving Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hi-Way Billboards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- California Trucking Association v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local 70, Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local 70Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.