Legal Opinion

Murray Hill Investments, Inc. v. Adas Yereim, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In three consolidated actions for a judgment declaring the parties’ rights under a note and mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated December 8,1994, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaints and cancelled notices of pendency filed in connection with each complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The declaratory judgment actions were properly dismissed. The relief sought in each of the declaratory judgment actions, i.e., a declaration as to the validity of the mortgage note, could be determined…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Freidus v. SardelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Top-All Varieties, Inc. v. Raj Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. FB Transit Road Corp. v. D.R.T. Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Fishkill v. Royal Dutchess Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. DiGeronimo v. AmrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. JMF Consulting Group II, Inc. v. Beverage Marketing USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. JMF Consulting Group II, Inc. v. Beverage Marketing USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API