Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1920No. 22,021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

An extended motion for a-rehearing filed by the defendants criticises the opinion modifying the one first filed, in respect to the homestead question. •

Upon full consideration the only change deemed requisite is the elimination of the statement in the last opinion that since *194the 105th Illinois, McMahill et al. v. McMahill, (105 Ill. 596), has been the law and rule of property in that state. Counsel have discovered that after having followed that decision until 1907, the Illinois supreme court departed from it in Colbert v. Rings, 231 Ill. 404.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMahill v. McMahillIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Colbert v. RingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Burns v. SpikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API