Legal Opinion
Kreinik v. Showbran Photo, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 10, 2005No. 1:02-mj-01172PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENCH OPINION
KARAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Edward Kreinik brings this action to collect compensation and benefits allegedly due from his former employer, Defendant Showbran Photo, Inc. (“Show-bran”), and related entities: Defendants Showbran Photo, Inc. Atlantis Health Plan (“Health Plan”); Showbran, Inc.; and Showbran, Inc. 401 (K) Plan. Kreinik asserts claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., Article 6 of the New York Labor Law, N.Y. Lab. Law § 190 et seq., and New York State common law. In October 2004, the parties tried the state-law…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Samuel S. SONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVES LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson v. Windham Community Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- In Re Fedex Ground Pckg. Sys., Inc., Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- POWELL v. LIBERTY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- VNUE, INC. v. LG CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC, JOSEPH LERMAN, BORUCH GREENBERG, DANIEL GELLMANDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026