Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Windham Community Memorial Hospital, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 24, 2011No. Civil 3:09cv511 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Peterson filed a Second Amended Complaint on September 25, 2009 claiming that by amending and/or terminating benefits under its Retiree Health Insurance Program, Defendant Windham Community Memorial Hospital (“Windham”) breached a promise to provide Peterson with lifetime health insurance benefits and is accordingly liable to Peterson under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(b) and (a)(3) for ERISA estoppel and breach of contract; and by failing to provide Peterson with accurate information about his insurance benefits…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Pabon v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Paneccasio v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bulovic v. BothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Jarosz v. Am. Axle & Mfg., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- POWELL v. LIBERTY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023