Legal Opinion
Rubel v. Linden Towers Cooperative No. 6, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Crawford, J.
Defendants move to dismiss all four causes of action contained in plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that each fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of *621action and on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action. The third and fourth causes of action (each for a declaratory judgment) are further challenged on the ground that they seek relief similar to that demanded in the first and second causes of action.
Plaintiffs are 20 shareholders of the defendant co-operative corporation and bring this action (a) individually, (b) as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Fieger v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franconia Village Cooperative, Inc. v. Lincoln Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Federal Housing Commissioner v. ReeseCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Bodrick v. Mayfair Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976