Bodrick v. Mayfair Construction Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentJasen, J.
I dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Division and dismiss the first cause of action on the ground that the courts of this State lack the necessary subject matter jurisdiction and may not, therefore, entertain the action.
*929Plaintiffs are nonunion laborers and mechanics who were employed by defendant Mayfair Construction Corp. at various times between August 29, 1962 and May 6, 1964. They had been hired to work on certain construction projects in Manhattan which were financed under the National Housing Act by a building loan insured by the Federal Housing Administration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Filardo v. Foley Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Fieger v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.