Legal Opinion

Rom E. Burton v. Harold E. Kyle

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 24, 2016No. N12C-07-127 WCCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROM E. BURTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N12C-07-127 WCC ) HAROLD E. KYLE, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: February 29, 2016 Decided: March 24, 2016 Defendant’s Motion for Costs – DENIED ORDER Gary S. Nitsche, Esquire, Samuel D. Pratcher, III, Esquire, 305 N. Union Street, Second Floor, P.O. Box 2324, Wilmington, DE 19899. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Wade A. Adams, III, Esquire, 3 M ill Road, Suite 301, W ilmington, DE 19806. Attorney for Defendant. CARPENTER, J. Upon consideration of Defendant Harold E. Kyle’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Costs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. AIU InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Donovan v. Delaware Water & Air Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Doe v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API