Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Carolina Pines Bowling Center

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1967No. Civ. 30499PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff, after patronizing the place of business conducted by defendant Carolina Pines, attempted to leave the premises through a glass “exit” door and sustained injuries to his left arm when the glass became dislodged from the aluminum door frame. The glass and door frame manufacturers, respectively, were exonerated from liability upon the theory that neither then exercised control of its product. The trial court found, however, that at the time in question the subject door was under the exclusive control of defendant Carolina Pines, that it was defective and unsafe for its intended use,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Honea v. City Dairy, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sweet v. SwangelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Franco Western Oil Co. v. FarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Anderson v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Kohler v. Aspen Airways, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API