Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Heck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1983No. 1193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from the denial of appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act1 (hereinafter “PCHA”).

Appellant pled guilty to statutory rape on September 13, 1976, and was sentenced four months later to a term of *68imprisonment of five (5) to ten (10) years. The direct appeal filed in this court resulted in our remand of the matter to the trial court on July 12, 1978, permitting the nunc pro tunc filing of a petition to withdraw the guilty plea. Commonwealth v. Heck, 258 Pa.Super. 602, 391 A.2d 683 (1978). However, no such petition was filed.

Instead, a pro se PCHA petition was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. DowlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. PaytonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. HeroldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EarlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API