Vijil v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge.
1 Appellant Albaro Vijil appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. On appeal, Vijil argues that substantial evidence does not support the Commission’s finding that Vijil failed to prove that he sustained a compen-sable injury while lifting heavy tools at his place of employment. We affirm.
Vijil had been employed since 2005 by appellee Schlumberger Technology Corp., a company that does work in the oil and gas industry. While working a shift on July 2, 2006, Vijil was unloading very large, heavy tools off of a pickup truck onto a platform,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Jeter v. B.R. McGinty MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Swift-Eckrich, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strother v. LaCroix OpticalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist. v. TennerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist. v. TennerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013