Legal Opinion

Vijil v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 2013No. CV-12-1117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge.

1 Appellant Albaro Vijil appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. On appeal, Vijil argues that substantial evidence does not support the Commission’s finding that Vijil failed to prove that he sustained a compen-sable injury while lifting heavy tools at his place of employment. We affirm.

Vijil had been employed since 2005 by appellee Schlumberger Technology Corp., a company that does work in the oil and gas industry. While working a shift on July 2, 2006, Vijil was unloading very large, heavy tools off of a pickup truck onto a platform,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Jeter v. B.R. McGinty MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strother v. LaCroix OpticalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist. v. TennerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Pulaski Cnty. Special Sch. Dist. v. TennerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API