Legal Opinion
Woodmancy v. Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 2, 2014No. 13-4395-cvUnpublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Barbara Lynne Woodmancy challenges the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability benefits. We review the administrative record de novo, but we will set aside the agency decision “only if the factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence or if the decision is based on legal error.” Burgess v. Astrue, 537 F.3d 117, 127 (2d Cir.2008) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). We have defined “substantial evidence” as more than a “mere scintilla,” and as “such relevant evidence as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Talavera v. Commr of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Darline Halloran v. Jo Anne Barnhart, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Winder v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Rorick v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Ango v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Beatty v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Brancato v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.