Legal Opinion

Burlington NRR v. GRABBER CONSTR. SUPPLY

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 23, 1989No. 23013-1-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

55 Wn. App. 772 (1989)

780 P.2d 890

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent,

v.

GRABBER CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY, INC., Appellant.

No. 23013-1-I.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 23, 1989.

Robert B. Spitzer and Strasburg, Levy & Spitzer, for appellant.

J. Michael Lovejoy and Helm, Helm & Lovejoy, for respondent.

FORREST, J.

Grabber Construction Supply, Inc., (Grabber) appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNR) on BNR's complaint and from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to BNR on Grabber's counterclaim.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API