Legal Opinion

Worcester Coal Co. v. Utley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Contract, upon four promissory notes and two instruments of guaranty. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Maynard, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions to the admission of evidence, the nature of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The plaintiff sold coal from time to time to the Southbridge Coal Company, and seeks in this action to hold the defendant, as guarantor, on one or both of two instruments purporting to be signed by him. The first of these instruments reads as follows: “ July 25, 1882. Worcester Coal Co. I will guarantee the payment of bills which the Southbridge Coal Company may have with you, and will indorse their notes at any time.” The second is in this form: “ August 1, 1882. Worcester Coal Co., Worcester, Mass. In consideration of one dollar, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I agree to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Warner v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dixon v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. McGonigle v. Victor H. J. Belleisle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Sullivan v. Crave & Martin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API