Legal Opinion

McGonigle v. Victor H. J. Belleisle Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is an action of tort in three counts. The first count is for breaking and entering the plaintiffs’ close, the second for the conversion of money and goods, and the third for the use of excessive force in removing the plaintiffs. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant on the first count, being so directed by the presiding judge, and for the plaintiffs on the last two counts; and the case is before us on the defendant’s exceptions.

The facts in the case may be briefly stated as follows: The plaintiffs were tenants at will of one Marston. On February 24, 1903, Marston executed a lease…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MeserveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Koplan v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Lash v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Clark v. KeliherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Potter v. BaldwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SansoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Mescall v. Somerset Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Koonce v. Aldo Realty TrustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Finnigan v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API