Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Phenix Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

This suit was brought in the state circuit court of Botetourt county, Va., and by the respondent removed into this court. It is a suit for specific performance of a parol contract of insurance alleged to have been made by the Franklin Brass Company, through its agents, J. B. Moore & Co., of Richmond, Va., with P. J. Otey & Co., of Lynchburg, Va., agents of the respondent insurance company. The contract is alleged to have been made by letter and telegraphic correspondence between the agents of the two companies, respectively. Moore & Co. were insurance brokers in the city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Smith v. BabcockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1839
  4. Brooks v. ByamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840
  5. Adams v. Bridgewater Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kimbro v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Farmers' Produce Co. v. McAlester Storage & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Field v. Missouri Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Howarth v. EllwangerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API