Legal Opinion

Hardin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1921No. 5762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Red River County, of fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property, and his punishment fixed at three years confinement in the penitentiary.. Upon his trial, a motion was made to quash the indictment, because of the fact that it charged no offense, and that the mortgage referred to was not set out either in haec verba, or in substance, and that no declaration of any specific indebtedness, such as could be recovered upon in a civil suit, appeared therein.

The charging part of the indictment is as follows;.“George. Hardin, . .. .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Windom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Samudio v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Conde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Depew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Norris Wayne Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API