Legal Opinion

Depew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1930No. 13581Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

on motion for rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The motion for rehearing is based upon the claim that the indictment is insufficient in that the mortgage relied upon is not set out therein. A copy of the mortgage is not embraced but a comprehensive description thereof is set forth in the indictment showing the date, the names of the parties, the amount of the indebtedness and the property mortgaged. The cases cited by the appellant do not require more. In the case of McElroy v. State, 150 S. W. 797, it is said:

“It is the better practice to set out the mortgage, or state the substance of it,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API