Legal Opinion

Rivers v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 6, 1941No. 1 Div. 132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is by a guardian ad litem of a minor. The guardian ad litem makes preliminary suggestion' that there was a suit pending at the time the instant petition was filed involving the validity of the adoption proceedings that culminated in a decree of adoption after the death of the petitioner (in the adoption proceedings), Mr. Rivers.

The prior equity suit by some of the heirs of Mr. Rivers against his widow and the minor child, the cestui que trust in this petition and subject of the petition for adoption, was to secure a judicial declaration of the effect of such alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prince v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Prince v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. St. Vincent's Infant Asylum v. Central Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. McCreary v. BillingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Marietta v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Appeal of RitchieNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re McCauley's AdoptionNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Benefield v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. In re A.W.K.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Garcia v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API