Legal Opinion

Benefield v. Faulkner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1947No. 4 Div. 424PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The bill in this case was filed by the complainants (appellants here) for the sale of 80 acres of land for division among the tenants in common. William G. Faulkner was made a party defendant, and required to propound his; claim-to the real estate1 involved. Faulkner filed an answer and cross-bill seeking an adjudication by, the court as to his rights to the land based upon a claim of adoption by M. A. Babston, who intended by such adoption, so Faulkner claims, to make him his heir at law. The other parties to the suit were collaterally related to M. A. Babston, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Prince v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Charles H. Cook Bible School v. CollierArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Prince v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Marietta v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. SingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Franklin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Besche v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Aniton v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Luker v. HydeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API