Legal Opinion

State v. Wurtz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1989No. 16090PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/SENTENCING/AFFIRMANCE

Defendant Ruben M. Wurtz (Wurtz) was convicted of four counts of sexual contact with a minor (SDCL 22-22-7) after a jury trial in the circuit court for Edmunds County.* The trial court sentenced Wurtz to four concurrent terms, of four years each, in the State Penitentiary. Wurtz appeals, alleging 1) that the assistance provided by his trial counsel was ineffective, and 2) that his conviction on four identically worded counts violated constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy. We affirm. For posterity, it should be noted that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PhippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. McBrideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DarbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API