Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Dallas Morning News
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, Justice, (Assigned).
Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) appeals the judgment granted in favor of the Dallas Morning News (the News) in a writ of mandamus action concerning the Texas Open Records Act (the Act). See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 552.001 to .358 (Vernon 1994 & Supp.1999). In three issues, DART contends that, because it timely asserted the litigation exception to requests for documents, the trial court had no jurisdiction to hear the mandamus action, and, further DART did not waive its right to assert the litigation exception. DART complains that the documents ordered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- University of Texas Law School v. Texas Legal Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Simmons v. KuzmichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Doe v. Tarrant County District Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In the Interest of King, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture v. Joe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Dos Republicas Coal Partnership v. David Saucedo, as Floodplain Administrator and County Judge of the Maverick County Commissioners Court, and the Maverick County Commissioners CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.