Legal Opinion
Doe v. Tarrant County District Attorney's Office
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 9, 2008No. 2-07-012-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.
Appellants J. Doe, individually, and as next friend of F. Doe and R. Doe (collectively, “Doe”) appeal from a trial court order denying their cross-claim for writ of mandamus seeking to compel appellee Tar-rant County District Attorney’s Office (“DA”) to formally disclose documents inadvertently released pursuant to a public information request. We affirm.
Background
Jacob Muniz pled guilty to indecency with a child and was sentenced to four years’ confinement. The incident occurred while Muniz was employed by Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Fort Worth, Inc. and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Seneca Surety Co., Inc., Dba Eydie's Bail Bonds, Through Victor Burgess, Agent v. Kalvin Davon Ross, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- Mason, Robert v. Glickman, David, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.