Legal Opinion

State v. Sherwood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This proceeding was initiated when the defendant presented to the trial court a pleading designated “Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Judgment, Sentence and Information in the Nature of Coram Nobis.” The grounds specified by him which are pertinent to our inquiry are as follows:

“(1) The Order Waiver and Presentment of Indictment filed September 8, 1949, is a false document filed without the knowledge, consent or any participation of the defendant at a time and date when the defendant was not before the Court.
“(2) The Waiver Arraignment and Plea filed September 8,1949, is a false document filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Marino v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Anderson v. BrittonOregon Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Estate of Ludington v. LudingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. SherwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API