Burse v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
Burse, convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of Hydrocodone, a Schedule III narcotic, appeals solely on the basis of the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence.
On reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment and the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Morgan v. State, 195 Ga. App. 732, 735 (3) (394 SE2d 639) (1990). Here, the conclusions of the trial court are supported by the record as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- State v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State v. JarrellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Leon-Velazquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Fritzius v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bentley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.