Legal Opinion

Oakford Realty Co. v. Boarman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 21, 1928No. [Nos. 24, 25, October Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, overruling the respective demurrers of the four appellants to the bill of complaint of the appellee.

The allegations of the bill are substantially as follows: The appellee, John J. Boarman, during the years 1926 and 1927, was engaged in the coal business in Baltimore, trading as the Hudson Coal Company. During the month of September, 1926, he was approached by Eli Silberstein, one of the appellants, who stated that his brother, Nathaniel Silberstein, appellant, would be interested in the purchase of coal for an apartment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Homer v. Crown Cork and Seal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Belt v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Trego v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  4. Beachey v. HeipleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Becker v. Frederick W. Lipps Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Spangler v. Dan A. Sprosty Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Van Royen v. LaceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Maas v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Neeb v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Atlantic Lumber Corp. v. WaxmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API