Legal Opinion

Quick v. Shell Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 6, 2005No. 1:00-1898; No. MDL 1358(SAS).;No. M 21-88PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On August 3, 2005, United States Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Re*359port recommending that plaintiffs’ motion to remand be denied.1 Plaintiffs object to three of Judge Bernthal’s determinations: first, that Shell Oil Company’s (“Shell Oil”) Notice of Removal was timely; second, that Shell Oil acted under federal direction, had a colorable federal defense, and had shown a sufficient causal nexus between the conduct directed by the federal agency and the harm about which plaintiffs complain; and, third, that “from…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Burchette v. GladstenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  3. Rosenberg v. Shemiran Co. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API