Legal Opinion

Turner v. Maschner

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1995No. 57,486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Petitioner Samuel Turner appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus (K.S.A. 60-1501), in which he alleged that the conditions surrounding his incarceration constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Specifically, petitioner contends that because of his segregated confinement in the Administrative Treatment and Segregation Unit (A&T), his opportunities for education, group religious services, employment services and vocational training and exercise are impermissibly restricted. We affirm.

The infliction of “cruel and unusual punishment” is constitutionally prohibited…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. LaReau v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McComb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  2. Astorga v. Leavenworth County SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Raine v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  4. Rhodes v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API